Decision making of juries

Download Now Although the jury is often referred to as one of the bulwarks of the American justice system, it regularly comes under attack.

Decision making of juries

They have no judicial system. We have to do something for these people. They introduced new religion and there was nothing wrong with our old religion.

We had our own ways of teaching our children, like the Elders and everything. There was nothing wrong with that way of teaching children.

The same thing with our judicial system. We have to introduce all these different things to them so they can be one of us. Chief Philip Michel Brochet Decision making of juries peoples have always had governments, laws and some means of resolving disputes within their communities. North American Aboriginal societies were dynamic cultures that adapted constantly to meet changing circumstances.

They had vast, complicated, intertribal trading systems that covered the continent. They developed sophisticated external relationships between and among tribes that cemented these commercial and political relations. Later, with the coming of Europeans, they extended similar trade Decision making of juries diplomatic relations to various countries in Europe.

Aboriginal peoples have persisted for thousands of years as distinct cultural entities. They never have been conquered in war. They have never surrendered their original right to govern themselves in accordance with their customs and cultures.

Although successive federal governments have tried to interfere with or diminish that right, and to replace it with their concepts of "Aboriginal" government, they have done so without much success. More importantly, successive federal governments and religious organizations in Canada have tried to interfere with, and even destroy, the cultures of Aboriginal people and to supplant them with European cultures and values, again without much success.

At best, this amounts to discrimination. At worst, it is cultural genocide. The daily, systemic cultural discrimination inflicted upon Aboriginal people by the justice system, however unintentional, demeans and diminishes the importance and relevance of their cultures, languages and beliefs.

At the very least, as one Aboriginal language interpreter told our Inquiry, Aboriginal people have a right to understand what is happening to them. I was appalled to learn that a man had been hired [as an interpreter] who does not speak any native Aboriginal language at all and it still exists.

And again, I ask these questions; how has this man been able to interpret for an Aboriginal person who cannot speak or understand English?

Decision making of juries

How many Aboriginal people have been denied the right to defend themselves because this man is not capable of understanding and interpreting their testimony? And how many Aboriginal people have pleaded guilty out the sheer futility of what seems to be a hopeless situation?

Barbara Whitford Portage la Prairie "What is certain for Aboriginal people," that same person added, is that what "they have managed to retain to a considerable degree, in all this turmoil, is their distinct identity.

In this chapter, we discuss Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal concepts of justice, in brief. We discuss how they are similar and how they are different. We try to explain how they work and how their purposes and processes differ. The prominent position accorded to elders is a striking feature of Aboriginal societies.

They have been largely responsible for retaining much of the knowledge of Aboriginal cultural traditions about which we heard so much in the course of our hearings. The role of elders within Aboriginal communities sometimes varied, but generally consisted of helping the people, individually and collectively, to gain knowledge of the history, traditions, customs, values and beliefs of the tribe, and to assist them to maintain their well-being and good health.

They were respected for their wisdom and for their experience, and for the fact that, having lived a long life, they were able to advise the people on what to do in difficult situations, as a result of that experience.

In some tribal authorities today, councils of elders exist, with the right to advise tribal officials and tribal governments on various matters of interest to the tribe. Elders have long been considered the ones who bridge between the ancient traditions and beliefs of the people and the modern-day influences that come into play in the day-to-day lives of Aboriginal men and women.

This was so even in past times when there were only Aboriginal people on this continent. Although the role of elders and healers came under strong attack as a result of government policy, elders still have a place of prominence within Aboriginal communities and there still are people within Aboriginal communities with knowledge and training in the traditions of Aboriginal healing.

The role of both elders and healers within Aboriginal societies is still very important and many Aboriginal people still go to them for advice, assistance and treatment, sometimes even in conjunction with treatment they may be receiving from medically trained professionals.

That is because, in almost all Aboriginal belief systems, each person has three aspects which make up his or her whole being. Those are the body, the mind and the spirit. In that respect, the Aboriginal belief is in the holistic treatment of the person.

Aboriginal healers, when called upon to minister to a sick person, do not only administer medicines to the body, but also conduct spiritual ceremonies for the spirit and counsel the person to help clear his or her mind of the effects of the sickness.

In Aboriginal beliefs, if only the body is treated, then healing cannot take place properly. If the body becomes ill, then the spirit and mind also are affected. In the same way, it is believed that before the body becomes sick, there are often signs of the impending sickness apparent in the mental or spiritual status of the person.Every current Supreme Court justice attended Harvard or Yale.

That’s a problem, say decision-making experts. Decision making in juries Essay. Decision making in Juries To study the decision making of Junes mock Juries and shadow Juries are used (I - Decision making in juries Essay introduction. E. ‘real’ Juries are not used as this Is banned by law).

A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or ashio-midori.com juries tend to be found in courts to ascertain the guilt, or lack thereof, in a crime.

In Anglophone jurisdictions, the verdict may be guilty or not guilty (not proven; a verdict of acquittal, based on the. The Luck of the Draw: The Role of Lotteries in Decision Making [Peter Stone] on ashio-midori.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. From the earliest times, people have used lotteries to make decisions--by drawing straws, tossing coins.

Publications. The Queensland Law Reform Commission publications listed below may be downloaded free of charge by clicking on the link of the relevant publication. Expert testimony is important for helping jurors make legal decisions when information needed for making those decisions is not common knowledge.

Jury - Wikipedia